its pretty much a small abandoned city stuffed together on a small island! Wikipedia articles should not be advancing any particular POV. Hashima Island goes by the name Gunkanjima in Japanese language, where gunkan in English translates to ‘battleship’ and jima or shima means ‘island’ in English. ", Wasn't this place featured in a hentai anime/movie? However, even the international ones are mostly just repeated coverage about Korea's opinion or sentiment about the issue (not new facts), and the ones used to justify the most controversial statements in the article (like the the two examples I noted above) are primarily the Korean sourced ones. (Seriously. The fundamental fact is that Japanese government official acknowledged it during the World Heritage Committee meeting. Walking among the buildings, the huge concrete apartment blocks—the first-ever built in Japan—are tall and futuristic. -James, The population denstity (/sq km) figure is not correct Swe 2 02:07, 18 July 2006 (UTC), According to Cabinet Magazine, Hashima is 6,3 acres (0.063km²) and according to the same page, the peak population was 5259 people. 211.31.201.14 (talk) 20:32, 13 September 2015 (UTC). The population on Hashima Island peaked in 1959 at 5,259, with a population density of 835 people per hectare. I certainly understand that point of view, but everybody has an opinion on these things and there are certainly other points of view as well. The first nickname is because of its haunted battleship looking appearance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.139.87.179 (talk) 14:20, 2 May 2011 (UTC), Check out the visual dossier by Yves Marchand & Romain Meffre [fr] in Hashima, l'illusion d'une île by François Bougon (from Le Monde's M weekly), comparing current photos of the ruined installations with black and white photos from the island's "golden" days. I certainly don't object to clarifying some of these points - forced laborers rather than prisoners, specifying Chinese prisoners of war, etc. The island was known for its undersea coal mines, established in 1887, which operated during the industrialization of Japan. Can someone add the required source info for it to be a valid entry? Ignoring the later is another case of 'only highlighting the positives while ignoring the negatives', which violates NPOV. I hope going forward we can address any disagreements in this point by point manner in working constructively to improve this article. Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:27, 7 May 2017 (UTC), A Korean film would be shown soon, http://www.firstshowing.net/2017/full-us-trailer-for-slave-labor-war-film-battleship-island-from-korea/ . 3. It is not a view specific to Korea or China. The second point is that Wikipedia is not a tabloid newspaper. In my opinion, they are not sensationalizing the issue but if you think they are, you should point to the specific sentences rather than deleting the whole bulk of it. 60.225.245.231 (talk) 01:55, 9 June 2013 (UTC), I've corrected the grammar and included a reference for the "H-Project" movie from Thailand.Steph6n (talk) 15:19, 1 September 2014 (UTC), Now that the island has formally been registered as a UNESCO property, is there any reason to keep the section detailing the steps and progress towards obtaining that status? Nagasaki. This article needs work by someone that is more familiar with the subject. The tone is POV because the narrative is set up to portray and emphasize a negative view of the Japanese position on this issue, without presenting it in a balanced or neutral manner.159.18.26.96 (talk) 14:37, 15 September 2015 (UTC). Also whether or not other wiki articles contain the same kind of information is irrelevant. Places for entertainment, including cinema, shops, and pachinko parlor, were also built for the residents. The removed information was a remark on the historical significance of the island and factual overview on political and diplomatic disputes (some are still ongoing) during the island's World Heritage Site selection process, which are very relevant to the island. The rocky slopes holding most of these buildings comprised about 60 percent of the total island area of 6.3 hectares (15.6 acres), while the flat property reclaimed from the sea was used mostly for industrial facilities and made up the remaining 40 percent. There also needs to be the Japanese characters which I am not familiar with either. That is violation of NPOV. 4) http://www.ilo.org/ mentions "forced" 204 times, and "slave" 22 times (although it's a general report applying not only to Hashima, Given the official UNESCO acknowledgement uses the term "forced", the fact that there was actually a separate controversy over what "forced" means (as noted in the UNESCO controversy section), and the fact that "forced" appears the more commonly used term in media, I think it is most correct to go with "forced" in this context. The core facts are that forced labor was used (which is mentioned), this issue was important to Korea and Korea objected to UNESCO status because of this (which is mentioned), and Korea waived their objections following Japanese agreement to acknowledge the issue (also mentioned). This is what I meant about presenting a certain POV. Regarding your comment on Auschwitz, what matters is not the design purpose of the facility. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.131.192.140 (talk) 12:26, 5 July 2020 (UTC), As per recommendations in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:POV#When_to_remove, I removed POV tag because there has been no discussion in the past month. When the coal … Monaco's density is 23,660/km2. Also, instead of the customary comments on the significance of the meeting made by themselves (not specifically relevant to the island and there were many other discussions during the meeting[14]), only the key outcome of the meeting is highlighted. was understandably removed for lack of sources. Summary as follows: Within the steppes of Mongolia, there are only about 4.5 human beings per square mile. Not to mention the acknowledgement by Japanese government during the World Heritage Committee (WHC) meeting and various other resources, the occurrence and nature of the forced labour ("forced labourers" were under "very harsh working conditions and brutal treatment") are verified facts by international standards as included in the 1999 report of the Committee of Experts on the Application of Conventions and Recommendations under the International Labour Organization[13]. What matters is what actually happened at the facility and how the facility was used. I understand you think this point is very important - that's fine and I wont debate that any further. If war crime is part of the island's history, then it is part of the island. Travel to the 16-acre (6-hectare) island on one of a number of boat tours that leave from various ports in Nagasaki. We need to mention about the film. As approval has already been granted, the process is no longer really as relevant. I've never heard of a principle that the length and relative amount of a certain narrative in an encyclopedia article should be determined proportionally to the time duration of the event, not by its significance. Below is a list of quotations made by some of the experts from various resources, some of which are already provided in this article. Unfortunately, nowadays the only way to get on Gunkanjima is through the official tour. In fact, the focus of the criticism is on giving away diplomatic concessions, not on making the wrongful acknowledgement. This then ends up reading like a forum, blog, or opinion piece explaining (or advancing) Korea's position on this issue, rather than an unbiased fact based summary of the actual issue. Additionally, if you add in all the negative points of view of the UNESCO meeting agreement, it's only fair to put in the positive points of view as well. As for Hashima, some seem not to want to remember that dark side and focus instead on its contribution as a locomotive of Japan's industrialization. Tour boats can be found at Nagasaki Port, which cost ¥4,000. Mitsubishi bought the island in 1890 to use it as a base for an underwater coal mining facility. If that was the case then virtually every article about every European city or town would have a subsection about how a forced labor camp was set up by Germany or the Soviet Union at some point during WW2. This is NOT a position specific to Korea. Commonly called Gunkanjima, Hashima Island in Nagasaki prefecture in Japan will be familiar to James Bond fans. http://www.herosandwich.net/category/atomic-robo/page/2/ Hashima, also known as Gunkajima or Battleship Island due to its shape, is an abandoned island an hour away from the port of Nagasaki in Japan. While this debate is unnecessarily heated, I actually think it is helpful in us narrowing down the points of agreement and disagreement. Please do not inflect your personal preference by insisting the NPOV tag. You cannot get positive impressions when describing something negative. From dense population to abandonment ‘The density of the population in Hashima was higher than that of Tokyo’s most crowded parts today,’ the artists tell Pen in an interview. The island reached a peak population of 5,259 in 1959. The island was featured in the James Bond movie Skyfall. Abandoned in 1974, it's now a ghost island … The island has been featured in numerous films, such as the 2003 film Battle Royale II: Requiem, the 1949 film Midori Naki Shima (The Greenless Island) was shot on There is even an online scholarly article written by Japanese, criticizing the issue.[2]. That's where I get concerned with POV. I agree, however, that the objections themselves may be important enough to note as background information. Off the coast of japan there is an abandoned island called Hashima Island. One interesting insight we received was that the seawall is often breached; large waves have damaged the … At the same time, the demand for coal was rapidly decreasing and in 1974, the whole island was abandoned. The word 'prisoners' may cast a wrong impression that convicted criminals were used as laborers (more precisely, they were Korean civilians and Chinese 'prisoners of war'). Lists: List of National Treasures of Japan (castles), This article needs work by someone that is more familiar with the subject. Fully acknowledging the past and explaining the current issues brought by the past should not be considered as sensationalizing. YouTube. 211.31.201.14 (talk) 00:47, 16 September 2015 (UTC). The majority of the sources for the comments provided are Korean, which is obviously the country most concerned with the island's UNESCO status. Walking among the buildings, the huge concrete apartment blocks—the first-ever built in Japan—are tall and futuristic. If a country officially says "our position is x", they have a clear attitude towards an issue that we can point to, but you cannot use the statements of one country or individuals as factual evidence in determining the official attitude of another country. 89.131.192.140 (talk) 11:11, 9 August 2020 (UTC), | b1 =
Is Jungkook The Best Vocalist In Kpop, Se Bikes So Cal Flyer 24, Python Faker Uuid, Nuud Deodorant Lumps, Nativity Story Twinkl, 4350 North Point Parkway, Alpharetta, Ga 30022, Church Of England Good Friday, Monaco Historique 2021 Entry List,